Sempat Melawan, Uci Dibekap Pakai Celana Dalam
JAKARTA, KOMPAS — Suci Tri Handayani (19) alias Uci, mahasiswi Fakultas Komunikasi Universitas Dr Moestopo Jakarta, yang diculik, dirampok, dan dibuang oleh empat pelaku di Karawang, Jawa Barat, ternyata sempat melawan para penculiknya.
Crime victim was a female university student in her early 20's. University SES class was AB class. Type of crime: kidnapping, and forced robbery.
Demikian keterangan yang didapat dari orangtuanya, M Asyari (55) dan Iklimah (45), saat ditemui wartawan di rumahnya di daerah Ciputat, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Senin (2/2) sore.
Menurut mereka, peristiwa penculikan dan perampokan itu bermula Sabtu (31/1) menjelang tengah malam. Awalnya, Uci janjian bertemu beberapa temannya di Cilandak Town Square, Jaksel. Untuk itu, Uci, gadis kelahiran Jakarta, 24 April 1988, meninggalkan rumahnya di Ciputat, Sabtu pukul 17.00, ke Citos. Dari sana, mereka ke kawasan Pondok Indah untuk menghadiri reuni SMA.
Kidnapping occurred late night on a Saturday. Victim's destination was a local high school reunion at a Cilandak town square.
Pukul 18.30, Uci menerima telepon dari seorang pria tak dikenal. Pria tersebut beberapa kali menghubungi Uci. ”Si pria mengaku kawan sekampus putri saya. Putri saya menanggapi dengan santun meski merasa belum pernah berkenalan,” tutur Iklimah.
Suspect initiated contact with victim through telephone call using regular interview method, claiming that the victim was a "friend" of the suspect. The victim went along and did not raise any suspicion on the suspects motives.
Key question: Where did the suspect get the victim's number? Either through a campus/ university student database or someone who knew the victim's number gave it to the suspects. In the latter case, this may indicate that the crime was planned and the victim's daily patterns may have been studied or observed prior to kidnapping.
Seusai reuni, Uci mampir ke rumah kos sahabatnya, Misye, di kawasan Cipete. Dari sana, bungsu dari tiga bersaudara yang dikenal aktif di kampus ini berniat pulang. Saat menunggu taksi di tepi jalan, si pria tak dikenal kembali menghubungi Uci.
Victim was known to be socially/ academically active in campus, victim was contacted again by suspects while she was waiting for a cab on a sidewalk.
Beberapa menit kemudian, sekitar pukul 23.00, sebuah mobil Honda Stream warna hitam berhenti di depan Uci. Pintu mobil dibuka, pria yang mengaku kawan sekampus Uci tadi memberinya tumpangan. Karena hujan deras dan gelap, Uci tak berpikir panjang dan masuk kendaraan.
Time of abduction was around 11 pm, victim was invited to enter Black Honda Stream (SUV type vehicle).
”Padahal sudah berulang kali saya ingatkan, 'Nak, kalau pulang lebih dari jam 24.00 lebih baik menginap di rumah teman atau di rumah nenek di Tanah Abang,” ujar Asyari. Ia juga membantah keterangan polisi sebelumnya tentang mobil Toyota Alphard yang disebut-sebut raib.
Melawan
Baru beberapa menit duduk di kursi tengah kendaraan, dua pria bertopeng kain yang bersembunyi di belakang muncul dan berusaha menyekap Uci. Korban yang saat itu memakai kaus biru lengan panjang dan celana pendek putih di atas lutut melawan.
Within minutes of entering the car, suspects who hid behind the vehicles middle passenger seats attempted to subdue the victim however the victim violently resisted
”Braaak!” perangkat AC mobil pun rusak oleh tendangan kaki Uci yang meronta. Dua pria yang mengapit Uci sempat kena bogem mentah korban. Meski demikian, Uci akhirnya menyerah setelah kedua kaki dan tangannya diikat plastik. Mulutnya diplakban hitam. Kepala Uci lalu ditutup dengan celana dalam yang kemudian diplakban di leher korban. ”Celana dalam itu milik putri saya. Karena sedang datang bulan, ia membawa cadangan di tas,” kata Iklimah.
Dalam perjalanan, Uci sempat mendengar pembicaraan pelaku yang meminta seseorang mentransfer uang karena perintah sudah dipenuhi. Mobil lalu berhenti. Tak berapa lama, sebuah mobil Daihatsu berhenti.
Order to kidnap may have been given by the group's mastermind.
Seorang pria yang turun dari mobil Daihatsu menghampiri jendela pintu Honda Stream untuk melihat kondisi Uci. Empat telepon genggam, uang Rp 50.000, kartu mahasiswa, KTP, dan ATM Uci diambil. Uci lalu dibuang di Karawang, Jawa Barat, Minggu (1/2) pukul 01.00. Setelah ditolong warga, Uci menghubungi kakak perempuannya. Pukul 04.00, kedua orangtua Uci menjemput korban di Polsek Teluk Jambe, Karawang, dan melaporkan kasus ini ke Polda Metro Jaya. Kasus ini ditangani Brigadir Polisi Satu Dita Yurilah.
Victim was disposed in Karawang area, around 3 hours after the kidnapping.
Dari sana, Uci dibawa ke RS Jakarta untuk divisum. Sebagian tubuh Uci memar karena melawan. ”Menurut putri saya, kasus serupa juga menimpa tiga rekannya sekampus beberapa waktu lalu. Yang dua orang putri, yang seorang lagi pria kemayu,” kata Iklimah. "Kata putri saya, ketiganya kehilangan komputer jinjing, kartu kredit, ATM, dan sejumlah uang,"lanjut Iklimah.
Interestingly similar cases had already occurred to three other students in the same campus, all of whom lost laptop computers, credit cards, ATM and cash money.
Kepala Satuan Kejahatan dengan Kekerasan Polda Metro Jaya Ajun Komisaris Besar Nico Afinta membenarkan kasus ini.
Summary:
The crime which occured to SuH, was conducted by multiple suspects during a late evening hour in which the suspects used a "Regular interview" method to approach and close in with the victim using the ruse that the victim and suspect were colleagues in campus.
The kidnapping may have been masterminded by someone who did not operate directly the group, however a note should be taken that upon successfully "controlling the victim" it was reported that the group "reported back" to the mastermind and asked for an account transfer saying that the job had been done.
Questions:
1. How was the mastermind connected to the victim?
2. How was the mastermind connected to the group?
3. What was the arrangement between the mastermind and the group? Did the mastermind provide information for the group and lived off the victim's stolen properties and in return provided the group with cash or was it the other way around?
Additionally three previous similar cases had occurred, therefore the victims may have been" selected and profiled" by the group or crime mastermind. In doing so the victim's observation must have been done by a campus "insider" who observed long enough to know the victim's activities and presumably the victim's friends.
The intent of the crime was property through the use of force, at the shortest amount of time possible as indicated in the time of abduction which was around 11 pm Saturday, and the time of the victim's release at around 1 am Sunday time.
Possible number of suspects: 3 to 5, possibly ages 20 - 30 and experienced as they were able to quickly "tie down" and restraining the victim using black sticky tape.
Although previous cases had been reported, it's unclear whether local police had followed up the previous cases to track the criminals and solve the case.